18.10.25
18 years online
6.9.25
Rotation Theory: Gold vs. Stocks
Gold, on the other hand, has been largely ignored, yet it is starting to regain attention. Rotation theory suggests that when one asset has been stretched for too long, capital may begin to flow toward the alternative. If that pattern repeats, the next few years could see gold outperforming stocks.
Why investors are watching this shift
- Stock valuations, especially in the U.S., look elevated.
- Inflation and currency debasement risks increase demand for hard assets.
- Gold has a history of performing well when confidence in financial markets weakens.
Because of this, a number of investors are overweighting gold (through ETFs like GLD) and gold miners (through funds like GDX) relative to stocks. Some add silver into the equation.
A balanced perspective
Nothing in markets is certain. Gold may fail to outperform, or equities may continue their run. For investors who do not want to sell their stock portfolios outright, one approach is to reposition within equities—keeping exposure, but tilting away from the most overvalued parts of the market.
An alternative stock allocation for the non-gold part
As a thought experiment, here is one possible equity mix that avoids the most expensive U.S. growth stocks and instead emphasizes regions and sectors with more reasonable valuations:
| Region / Sector | % | ETF | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|
| Emerging Markets ex-China | 25 | IEMG | Growth from India, Mexico, Indonesia, lower valuations than U.S. |
| Japan | 20 | EWJ | Corporate reforms, attractive valuations, shareholder-friendly changes. |
| Europe (broad) | 20 | VGK | Exposure to developed Europe at cheaper multiples than U.S. peers. |
| Energy (global/US) | 15 | XLE / IXC | Hard assets, strong cash flows, hedge against inflation. |
| Industrials / Infrastructure | 10 | EXI | Benefiting from reshoring, defense spending, infrastructure projects. |
| Healthcare (defensive global) | 10 | IXJ | Stable demand, demographics, defensive anchor. |
Final word
This is not advice, just theory. Rotation may or may not happen. But if gold does gain leadership over stocks, holding a mix of gold, gold miners, and a diversified set of reasonably valued equity sectors could be one way to stay balanced.
8.7.25
The AI job crisis. Solutions before disruptions
Libertarian and Austrian economics, with their trust in individual ingenuity over state control, offer a way forward, but we need specific, practical solutions—not just faith in markets—to ensure freedom and opportunity endure. The crisis demands clarity. The IMF’s figures paint a stark picture: in advanced economies, nearly two-thirds of jobs could be affected, from routine tasks to high-skill professions. Austrian economics, rooted in entrepreneurial adaptation, suggests markets can respond, but not without deliberate steps to empower individuals. Left unchecked, mass unemployment risks desperation, eroding the liberty we cherish. We must act decisively, blending pragmatism with principle, to avoid a future where centralized power exploits economic chaos. Libertarianism prioritizes minimal government, rejecting heavy-handed policies like AI taxes that stifle innovation. Yet, the scale of this disruption calls for bold, market-compatible measures.
Friedrich Hayek, the Austrian economist, hinted at this balance in The Constitution of Liberty (1960), advocating a minimal income to prevent destitution while upholding market dynamics. Inspired by this, a universal basic income (UBI) intended to offer temporary stability amid the AI-driven job crisis is impractical, as funding through voluntary contributions—such as profits shared by firms across all industries benefiting from AI opting into a decentralized pool—cannot be sustained due to the absence of sufficient funds. This idea, while theoretically appealing, cannot be implemented in practice because no viable non-coercive revenue source exists, rendering it unfeasible regardless of libertarian compatibility.
Another game-changer lies in property rights, the cornerstone of Austrian and libertarian thought. Ludwig von Mises saw property as the foundation of markets, enabling prices to guide resources. Today, your data—your online habits, social media posts—is property, but tech giants like Google control it. Digital property rights, secured through blockchain or smart contracts, would let you own and monetize your data, creating income outside traditional jobs. Unlike traditional property, like land, digital property is intangible and often platform-locked, but it’s no less yours. By selling your data to advertisers or AI developers, you could earn a steady income, rooted in market-driven value, not state handouts. This empowers individuals, aligns with Austrian price mechanisms, and sidesteps dependency.
To turn this vision into reality, targeted actions can bolster freedom and resilience:
• Establish digital property rights via legislation and blockchain, enabling individuals to profit from their data in a free market.
• Deregulate startups by removing licensing barriers, fostering new industries as satellite data once spurred weather forecasting growth.
• Strengthen decentralized platforms to keep economic power with individuals, reducing the risk of authoritarian overreach.
• Encourage voluntary innovation hubs where communities and businesses collaborate to create new economic opportunities.
Government’s role remains limited: enact these frameworks—protecting rights, easing regulations—then step back. The market has always surprised us with adjustments once deemed impossible, or perhaps this marks the quiet end of libertarian ideals in the face of relentless automation.
4.4.25
The Shiller P/E Ratio: A Simple Guide for Everyone
If you’ve ever wondered how to tell if the stock market is overpriced or a bargain, the Shiller P/E ratio is a tool you’ll want to know about. It’s a popular way to measure the value of stocks, and it’s easier to understand than it sounds. In this article, we’ll break it down step-by-step: how it’s calculated, where you can find it, if it’s used beyond the S&P 500, and how to use it to guess what returns might look like. Let’s dive in!
1 How Is the Shiller P/E Ratio Calculated?
The Shiller P/E ratio, also called the Cyclically Adjusted Price-to-Earnings (CAPE) ratio, was created by economist Robert Shiller. Unlike the regular P/E ratio, which just looks at a stock’s current price divided by its earnings from the past year, the Shiller version takes a longer view to smooth out the ups and downs.
Here’s how it works in simple steps:
- Step 1: Take the price of the S&P 500 (or another index or stock) right now.
- Step 2: Gather the earnings per share (EPS) for the past 10 years.
- Step 3: Adjust those earnings for inflation so they’re all in today’s dollars (this keeps things fair over time).
- Step 4: Average those 10 years of adjusted earnings.
- Step 5: Divide the current price by that 10-year average.
For example, if the S&P 500 is at 5,000 and its 10-year average inflation-adjusted earnings is 150, the Shiller P/E would be 5,000 divided by 150 = 33.3. That’s it! The idea is to avoid getting thrown off by short-term booms or busts in earnings.
2 Where Can You Find It?
You don’t have to crunch the numbers yourself—plenty of free resources track the Shiller P/E ratio for you. Here are some great places to look:
- Multpl : A simple site with the current Shiller P/E and a chart going back over 100 years.
- GuruFocus: Offers the latest Shiller P/E for the S&P 500, plus other market insights.
3 Does It Exist for Other Markets?
Yes! While it’s most famous for the S&P 500, the Shiller P/E has been calculated for other markets too. Researchers and financial sites have applied it to indexes like the Dow Jones, NASDAQ, and even international markets such as the UK’s FTSE 100, Japan’s Nikkei 225, and emerging markets. However, the data might not be as widely available or go back as far as it does for the S&P 500. Sites like GuruFocus or research papers from economists often include CAPE ratios for these other markets if you dig a little.
4 How to Use It: Ranges and Expected Returns
So, what does the Shiller P/E tell us? It’s like a thermometer for the stock market—higher numbers suggest stocks are expensive (overvalued), and lower numbers hint they’re cheap (undervalued). Over time, it’s been linked to future returns: when it’s high, expect lower returns over the next decade; when it’s low, expect higher ones. Here’s a simple guide:
Historical Average: Since the late 1800s, the Shiller P/E for the S&P 500 has averaged around 16-17. Think of this as “normal.”
Ranges:
- Below 15: Stocks are cheap! This has happened during big crashes, like 2008-2009 when it dipped to 13.
- 15-25: Fair value territory—neither a steal nor overpriced. This is where it sits most of the time.
- 25-35: Getting expensive. Investors are paying a premium, like in the mid-2010s or today (it’s around 33-35 in 2025).
- Above 35: Very high! It hit 44 in 1999 before the dot-com crash and has only topped 35 a few times (1929, 2000, and recently).
Expected Returns Per Year:
- Below 15: Historically, returns over the next 10-20 years averaged 8-10% per year or more.
- 15-25: Returns drop to about 5-7% annually—still decent but not amazing.
- 25-35: Expect 2-4% per year. That’s where we are now—modest growth ahead.
- Above 35: Returns could be 0-2% or even negative, like after the 2000 peak.
For example, with a Shiller P/E of 33, history suggests S&P 500 returns might average 3-4% per year for the next decade—not terrible, but not the 10% many hope for. It’s a clue, not a crystal ball, so use it alongside other info.
18.2.25
P&F Charts: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
The Good: Why Traders Love PF Charts
The Bad: Where P&F Charts Fall Short
The Ugly: The Learning Curve
So, Should You Use PF Charts?
7.12.24
Hedging Your Portfolio with Reverse ETFs
13.10.24
Are they really fighting?
Take a look at this chart. It's a visualization of the S&P 500 divided by the price of gold—basically, what happens when you price the stock market in gold instead of dollars. The result? A story of financial cycles that many miss if they only focus on stocks or only on gold. This chart doesn’t just show market moves; it shows when one asset reigns supreme over the other.
In times when the line trends upwards, it's better to own stocks. Confidence is high, economies are expanding, and the return on equities outpaces the stability gold offers. But when the chart takes a sharp dive? That’s gold's time to shine. These moments represent financial turbulence, recession fears, or market corrections, where investors seek safety in gold’s enduring value.
Now, here's the kicker. Many analysts believe we’re on the verge of another significant downward leg in this chart. If that proves true, it would mean a shift in favor of gold over stocks—a warning shot for those clinging too tightly to equities. But let’s be clear, nothing is certain. What this chart does tell us is that these shifts happen, and when they do, it’s dramatic. Watching for these changes can make all the difference.
That said, it’s not about being all in on gold or stocks. The real strategy is balance. Holding both assets in a portfolio, but adjusting the weight depending on which part of the cycle we're in, is the key. Early in a downward segment? You might tilt toward gold. In the upswing? It’s time for equities to shine. Finding the exact mix is very complicated. What matters is to have the foresight to adjust the desired percentage with the cycles.
This isn’t advice—it’s a reminder to watch the clues, understand the patterns, and adjust your strategy before the next shift catches you off guard.
12.8.24
UGL?
UGL, the ProShares Ultra Gold ETF, offers investors a unique way to gain exposure to the gold market by aiming to deliver twice the daily performance of the price of gold bullion. Grosso modo, this means that for every 1% movement in the price of gold, UGL is expected to move 2% in the same direction. UGL can be easily traded through most brokers, making it accessible for those looking to leverage their position in gold without the need to trade gold futures or other more complex financial instruments.
18.6.24
Zimbabwe’s new gamble
Zimbabwe has a long and troubled history with its currency. After a period of hyperinflation in the early 2000s, the country abandoned its currency in 2009 and switched to a multi-currency system dominated by the US dollar. However, economic woes persisted, leading to the reintroduction of a local currency, the Zimbabwean dollar (ZWL), in 2019. Unfortunately, this attempt backfired, causing renewed inflation.
In April 2024, Zimbabwe took another stab at currency reform with the launch of the ZiG (Zimbabwe Gold). This time, they're hoping a gold-backed currency will be the answer.
The ZiG: A New Approach
Unlike previous currencies, the ZiG is backed by a "basket" of assets, including:
- Foreign currency reserves: US$285 million at launch, raising concerns about its adequacy.
- Gold: 2.5 tonnes of gold currently held by the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe (RBZ), with plans to increase gold production and channel it into the reserves.
- Other precious metals and minerals: Platinum, lithium, and diamonds mined in Zimbabwe could also contribute to the reserves.
The ZiG's value is tied to the price of gold and a comparison of inflation rates between the ZiG and the US dollar. This, in theory, should provide stability and prevent hyperinflation. Link here.
Can the ZiG Succeed Where Others Failed?
Skeptics abound. Critics point to the following weaknesses:
- Insufficient reserves: The current reserve value is considered too low to provide real import cover or meet regional liquidity recommendations.
- Government mismanagement: Zimbabwe's history of economic troubles raises doubts about the government's ability to manage the ZiG effectively.
- Lack of trust: Years of currency instability have eroded public trust in Zimbabwean currency.
A Glimmer of Hope?
Despite the criticism, there are some potential positives:
- Gold-backing: Gold is a historically stable store of value, and linking the ZiG to it could provide some stability.
- Increased gold production: Zimbabwe's plans to boost gold production could strengthen the ZiG's reserves in the long run.
The Verdict: Too Early to Tell
The success of the ZiG remains to be seen. Only time will tell if it can overcome public skepticism and become a stable and trusted currency.
17.4.24
Portfolio review
As you can see on the right, Portfolio Model, our portfolio is based on hedging risks. It includes stocks, gold and cash or short-term bonds.
In general, the performance is good: last year it returned 7.2% and this current year around 3% so far, basically due to the good behavior of gold.
Our 2 ETFs to track the stock market haven’t been the greatest, but they invest in solid business which pay dividends (DTN 2.7% and DOO 3.9%).
Gold finally decided to move upwards and now it is trading in uncharted territory. We still believe this is just the beginning:
As always, this is not a recommendation at all, but just a theoretical study of how gold and stocks combined can hedge market risks.
17.2.24
Business opportunities in Kazakhstan
9.1.24
Loss aversion. Flip for it
18.10.23
How global distress drives up gold prices
28.8.23
Shrinkflation: when less is hidden in more
Shrinkflation doesn't only affect our wallets; it also contributes to an increase in waste and packaging materials. As containers remain the same size while the contents shrink, a concerning gap between perception and reality emerges. This mismatch often leads consumers to purchase more than they need, believing they are getting the same quantity as before. Consequently, more goods are consumed and more waste is generated, resulting in a negative impact on the environment.
The link between shrinkflation and waste is rooted in psychology. Known as the "size-contrast illusion," our brains tend to judge the quantity of a product based on the package's size rather than the actual contents. When these packages appear unchanged, we unconsciously assume they contain the same amount as before. However, this optical illusion doesn't just affect our purchasing decisions; it also fuels overconsumption and unnecessary waste generation.
In light of these practices, consumers are encouraged to adopt a vigilant approach. While it may be challenging to spot shrinkflation immediately, there are steps one can take to make more informed choices. One strategy is to verify the price per unit, weight, or volume. Focusing on these metrics allows consumers to compare products more accurately and gauge whether the product's value has genuinely changed. Additionally, it's essential to remain skeptical of drastic changes in packaging design or brand positioning. These may signal an attempt to divert attention from the actual reduction in content. Staying informed about the products you regularly purchase and their typical sizes can also help you quickly recognize any subtle alterations.






